Honestly, I think you might literally be the only person doing this. I don't see how this would ever be an effective and efficient way to communicate while banned.

Well, I really don't see why this privilege needs to be revoked. I don't think the ability to edit clan description while banned causes any issues, and if you managed to find a way to use it to your advantage - good for you. Chat violations in clan descriptions can be reported by players to tech support (which, I think, leads to the clan getting blocked), so it's not like you can continue to violate rules fearlessly after being banned in chat.

"Please" was already correct. Added "mir"

I assume the word is "лагер", which means "lagger".

Too specific and not very impressive. I would say that not catching gold boxes isn't much of a challenge.

Under review

Topic merged Are you trying to make people hate you? :D So far we've only been getting ideas to reduce restriction from bans and give MORE options for communication while banned. And here you are, suggesting the exact opposite. Don't get me wrong - I agree with what you're saying, but I feel like this is unnecessary, since the clan's description is really not an effective way to communicate. I mean, when someone addresses you in a battle or in server chat, how are you going to tell them that you will reply to them via your clan's description? It's just not going to work.

2100

We already have "most players with no staff", and I think it's enough. It's basically the same thing.

Topic merged I think it's best to just wait what the devs come up with first.

Topic merged Developers decided that self-healing was too overpowered and always caused disbalance in games, no matter how it was changed. So instead Isida got a massive damage and healing buff to compensate for removal of self-healing.

Valid

Autobalance can be disabled :)

Nah, there was usually at least 1 or 2 per game, especially on higher ranks. Free players only got a miserable 60 supplies per day (total, not 60 of each), so they either had to save up on multiple account for a month and then play one short battle per week with full supplies, or play normally, rarely using supplies, which put them at the complete mercy of the "druggers" in that game. And then there was the takeover groups, which would create 999-flag 24-hour battles, wait for normal players to build up a high fund, then join the losing team and steamroll the winners in 30 minutes, crushing their dreams and expectations.

:ph34r:

You mean back when a single buyer with a ton of supplies single-handedly decided the outcome of a 10v10 game? Because that's how I remember it...

When a gift has that message, it simply means that the player who sent it is currently banned from chat. In the future if you want to ask a question about the game, please refrain from creating new topics and use the official Q&A topic or the Q&A site. Closed.

Topic merged

Topic merged The idea is planned, but don't expect it to be implemented anytime soon. It's a very low priority task at the moment.

Yes, of course.

Updated! Previous record moved to archive.

Topic merged In case you're being serious - no, that's just a normal player who has a name similar to "Godmode_ON".

I don't think any other commands work. Pretty sure they require other dev tools in order to function.

Well, in that case I don't have much to say here. Haven't played many games that have a similar style to Tanki, i.e. in-browser, free to play, action-arcade, etc.

Thing is, what if you want to buy something while in a game? Sure, it's not common to buy turrets and hulls mid-game, but why would devs remove an option to BUY??? :P