Please try and add more information to your topic (data, comparisons, your own opinions, etc.), otherwise your topic might get locked, because we already have topics to discuss garage equipment.

OK, you win :) But I still think this option would be an interesting alternative. The game isn't all about getting the highest funds, you know...

Tell me then why do TDMs have high funds if there are twice fewer players you can kill?

As I said many times before - with the 20 seconds delay (and 10 seconds falling time) the chances of catching a gold box are balanced: Players with heavy hulls won't be able to go around the whole map in 20 seconds, but if they do find the gold drop location they are very likely to catch the gold box as they won't be killed or pushed from underneath it. Players with light hulls will almost always have enough time to find the gold box drop location due to high speed, but are unlikely to catch the gold as they can be easily killed/pushed. You just have to make a choice and go with it. If you have trouble remembering all the places where golds drop, you should check out my topic: Gold Box drop locations

Closed.

Duplicate topics merged.

Duplicate topic. Please continue discussion here: Gold Boxes Guide Next time please the search option to make sure a topic with the idea you want to post hasn't been created before. Closed.

That's also true...

Answered. In the future if you want to ask a question about the game, please refrain from creating new topics and use the official Questions and Answers topic. Closed.

Ok, can you mark the exact spots on the map? http://tnkscr.net/z7w2rJ.jpg

Why would the battle fund be low? By that logic, the fund in TDM would be many times less than in DM and it's not. I don't see a problem with everyone being in alliances, but I highly doubt that it will happen as even now teams are uncommon in such games. Also, like I said - being in a team reduced your gun's damage, so not everyone will want to make such a sacrifice.

I never said that my system would replace the current DM. It would just be an alternative for those, who like teams.

There's a difference between 1 big team vs. another big team and a team of 2 vs. 20 players

The idea is that being in a team has it's advantages and disadvantages, so that single players don't have to suffer when playing against OP teams. P.S. I forgot to mention - the option can be disabled or enabled when battles are being created, so players, who dislike teams, can enter or create battles with alliances disabled.

DM isn't the most popular game mode in this game and I think that's mostly because it simply isn't interesting enough at the moment since all you have to do is shoot and not get shot. Players often try to make it more interesting for themselves by agreeing to team up with others and play together. However, such a system often annoys other players and causes conflicts in the battle chat. My idea is to add an option to create "Alliances" in DM. Players, who dislike teams in DM can create/participate in battles with this option disabled, as it will be a tick box that players will select when creating the battle. In the battle there would be a special button for teaming up in DM (you select a player in the list and send them a request to team up). Your request to team up will show up in the top-right corner of the person you wist to team up with, similar to an invitation notification. It will be possible to disable these notifications, making it impossible for others to send you an "alliance proposal". If they accept your request, the two of you will become an official team in that battle, which will change your gameplay in such a way that: Your weapons will deal 10-15% less damage to enemies You won't be able to damage each other If you destroy a tank together with your partner, you will get 30 xp points divided between you two depending on the damage each of you dealt (like in team battles) If the two of you completely kill an enemy tank from full HP, each of you will get a kill. If other players also dealt damage to the tank you were destroying, only the person dealing the final hit will get the kill. Teams can be from 2 to 4 players and each additional player in the team will reduce the team's gun damage by another 10% and increase total score distributed per kill by 10 points. If there is an existing team of 2 or 3 players, any other players wishing to join will send a teaming request to either player in the existing alliance and both (or 2/3) players need to accept it to allow the other player into their alliance. Example: A Firebird, 40hp/s damage teams up with a Twins (15 hp/ball damage) and a Railgun (100 hp/shot damage) in a DM battle. Together they see a Mammoth with 300 hp and destroy him. Since there are three players in the alliance, their gun damage is reduced to 80%, so the Railgun deals 80 damage (one shot), the Twins deals 60 damage (5 shots, 12 damage per shot) and the Firebird deals 160 damage (5 seconds at 32hp/sec). Since there are three of them, the total number of points distributed for the kill is 40. The Firebird gets about 21 points for dealing 53% of the damage; the Railgun gets 11 points and Twins gets the remaining 8. Each player gets a kill added to their kill-count. I believe such a system would make DM matches a lot more interesting and tactical, encouraging more players to enter them ,especially if they like to play with friends. This would be great for times when you want to play in a big battle with your friends, but you can't get 10 of them together to play CTF or TDM with all of you in one team, while playing with one friend and 9 random people usually doesn't end well. Instead, you would just enter a DM match and play together in a team against everyone else. Idea originally appeared in this topic Important: It will be possible to turn alliances off in battle customisation settings and play normal DM, if you wish to play alone and don't want to deal with teams.

I just love how everyone is so evenly arranged at right angles under the gold ^_^

Currently the most effective maps for getting crystals quickly are CP matches on small maps. Polygon CP appears to be the most common type. In the future if you want to ask a question about the game, please refrain from creating new topics and use the official Questions and Answers topic. Closed.

Topics merged

Answered. In the future if you want to ask a question about the game, please refrain from creating new topics and use the official Questions and Answers topic. Closed.

An old friend of mine. He's in our "Officers" club on the RU forum. Pretty cool guy actually :) Old screenshot:

Try them at M0 and upgrade to M1 whichever combo you like most. Generally, the more powerful weapon or hull is the one that unlocks later and costs more, so in your case Hornet and Thunder are more powerful. Closed.

Guize!!! Y U leav so faaaast?!?!?!

If you have ideas for new features to add or change in the game, you can post them in the Ideas and Suggestions section. However, the purpose of the Ideas and Suggestions section is to give players a chance to share their ideas with the developers to improve the game. Kits are designed by the developers only - they analyse their statistics and change garage kits according to their own principles in order to generate the most interest and therefore, income. This means that the developers will never go to the forum and add new kits just because some players suggested them, meaning that this topic is pointless. If you want a more detailed explanation - PM me. Closed.

Because most of the maps here are a work in progress and new locations are added as players report them. If you see a gold in a locations which is not yet marked - please report it to me and I will add it.