Gold drops are already enough distraction - this suggestion would completely ruin battles. Why spend supplies trying to accomplish the battle-mode objective when you can just mult for crystals? And that's what will happen with many players.

Lots of people did not. Garage is too slow and requires too many clicks to navigate around.

This has been answered before in other threads - but here we go one last time... - Can't choose progression path - it's dependent on random container contents (modules) - Not suitable for casual gamers - League keeps re-setting players downward unless they play a lot. - Camera angles and movement was very odd - Tanks were cartoonish - too big/close to camera and had a goofy, bouncy movement - Not enough maps - Then there was the "deserter" status issue. Punishing players for leaving a battle just never works. Give them a reason to stay. The best thing TX implemented was the pre-battle lobby. Allowed you to see map before battles starts and made sure that at least at start of battle teams were even.

Would not have mattered. Had an account for a year and was not happy at all with the game. IF they improved it any after I quit they waited too long. Only benefit from that account was the rewards I got in TO for having played TX during the critical time period.

Yes and no. In TX - they were too big - they looked cartoonish. Did not like their movement nor the camera. And that's the problem for casual gamers - they really could not compete in TX - unlike in TO. I'm a casual gamer and I never buy. But I can still compete in TO.

I have 33,000 so... didn't notice if it went up by 0.3% ?

If you don't do missions you lose out on lots of crystals and supplies. You will quickly fall behind your competition unless you are already a Legend with a decent garage.

You couldn't win without Top-Tier modules and you could BUY containers to get the modules. So yes - it was P2W.

campers will use it a lot and get 150% damage on an ambush. then - when confronted can quickly switch to 200% armor. Sounds kinda OP to me.

My General account just left a battle where enemy team had Gismos, Commanders and Field Marshals. My team - we had 2 Marshals and the rest were my rank or lower. It was ridiculous.

Yeah - the Titan-Shafts that head off to a corner to pump up their K/D don't help your team much in CTF.

So wounded campers in hiding will have plenty of extra kills. Can imagine a magnum getting down to 25% health then retreating to base and staying there entire battle, surrounded by mines. Bleccchhhh.

Your first mistake is assuming I only play on 1 account. WRONG. On this account I play a lot of Pro-battles but still do missions. Other account is MM. Vulcan only has unlimited energy if it also has the immunity augment equipped - an augment only availabe through sheet luck or $. Else it sef-destructs. At long range it only does 500 damage - assuming every bullet hits the target. If target is moving it will definitely not be 500. So saying it is unlimited range Isida is a poor comparison. EVERY high-damage turret is OP with Hornet OD. Magnum can 1-shot a medium hull with DD and hornet OD - even during spawning. Sounds like you have tunnel vision and a hate-on for Vulcan. Spend some of that energy campaigning for a Hornet OD nerf. Would serve you better.

I don't play many battles per day and I get repeated maps all the time. Have gotten same map 3x in row on occasion. I do not believe the whole list is randomized - I think they are rotating them in groups. And many maps dont see for months. And some maps see every week and even every day.

The augment alteration is bad enough. The fact they allow splash damage to remove supplies adds insult to injury. Should only occur on the prime target of the snipe.

?

So it can't change it's orientation to move through a narrow alley that runs east-west? And when it crosses an est-west bridge it does so sideways? That is just dumb.

Close. Google "jumping the shark".

2 Dictators on 1 team will have a huge impact on how often they get OD - and thus how much they can dominate. ODs are one of THE deciding factors in how a battle will go. Plus your supplies are not gonna help much if the hunter is getting OD frequently.

This game is jumping the Shark Tank (personally I think it happened a while ago, if not a joke this certainly cements it)

Careful - the "exit" police might judge you...

They may not have bought from the Shop - this can be accounted for by the conversion from m6.10 to mk7.0 allowing them to upgrade further. Plus... as a Major General it is not uncommon for you to play against Commanders, Gismos and even Legends. In this case it's the MM rank-spreads that are the issue. My second account now at General runs up against players using upgraded Defender drone. Good luck trying to destroy those tanks.

When my alt account was Colonel it was fighting Gismos - not all the time mind you - but often enough to be quite annoying.

Scope is divided into many regions and there's cover and tunnels - would be interesting to see how it would do. I'm not much of a camper - I use smoky, ricco, isida on one account and freeze, vulcan and gauss (yes a sniper) on another. Last few times I played I don't think snipers dominated. But have not played many battles there over past year or so.

This is not needed. Develoing skills can happen without playing against Legends. There is no need at all for lower ranks to play with Legends. Just the opposite in fact.