On a shaft? yeah probably. On a freeze or isida, hard to say...

Hey - way to work the system. ;) Since you only paid 100 crystals, that's a 900 crystal bonus!

Anyone who points out the poorly executed updates/events is a troll? :o You've gone through your entire life happy about everything, and not once griped about something? <_<

Yeah - I've retired striker until they change it. I play TO to have fun. Don't have fun with striker. Why not use the OP-turret-du-jour? FREEZERAMMA

So I have a Lions account - and can't play for another... 7-8 hrs (when turn 4 should have still been active). Does this mean I have no chance to earn containers for turn 4?

I'm not blaming MM - I'm blaming the way they have set up the rules for getting stars in the WAR. This (undisclosed) threshold discourages players from staying in partially completed battles MM drops them into. At the moment qualifying for containers and supporting team is at least as important as battle-fund.

Yeah - from now on, when MM puts you into a partially completed battle on losing side - just exit and search for new battle. Don't waste your time in a losing cause to get ZERO stars.

They still are not transparent about what is the exact threshold is to get minimum of 1 star. Match-Maker has dropped me (multiple times) into partially completed battles on the losing side. Why would I bother staying in that battle if my odds of getting just 1 star are drastically reduced? Better to exit and look for fresh battle than to waste 3 minutes in hopeless battle. This defeats the purpose of MM, does it not?

Been preaching this line for a while. So now they've "balanced" Thunder against all the players who spent thousands of crystals to reduce that damage. What about those who don't have Thunder module equipped? Not so balanced...

can't imagine anyone not voting on the vault in that round then...

Are you suggesting that only the players who voted to "attack" the vault in the turn it is taken will receive the bonus 15 containers? That makes no sense. This is a team game. And many will then just vote for the vault as they will still receive team rewards if there is a win.

Matchmaker relies on keeping battles full to keep teams even. So if someone drops out (for whatever reason) matchmaker will fill that empty slot - even if battle is > 1/2 over. Now if players are dropped into a game in progress (usually on losing team) they might not have a chance to meet the threshold. We've seen reports on this numerous times - and has happened to me. Why would any player stay in the battle if dropped in already in progress, when there's a significant chance they won't meet the threshold? This can't be good for match-Maker.

Was this threshold documented somewhere?

Before server re-set my account had 2 stars. After re-set it said 0. I did 5 stars after re-set for a total of 7 stars. But site showed only the 5 I just accumulated. is this going to happen before/after every server re-set? Am I wasting time collecting any stars before re-set? Why not have the turns coincide with server re-set so these problems won't occur at all?

4 hrs left on turn and the server re-set erased the 2 stars I collected this turn. What's up with that?

Au contraire... For sticking it out on the losing end of a one-sided battle players should get extra stars, not zero. Why on earth would anyone stay in a match-making battle if they get placed there with < 5 minutes left. No one will be willing to fill the empty slots of partial battles. This really will kill match-maker.

I like how no one on your team got any stars... :o

So just finishing a battle gives no stars? You must have a specific # of kills? Oh my. Won't be staying in any partial battles then. Exit and try again. And good luck to isidas with the healing alteration. Way to Kill Matchmaker Devs.

Did you finish the battle? How would LUCIFER have any stars without voting? Can't have 4 stars without voting first.

The descriptions in wiki for some turrets - (hammer included) are quite poor. Wiki tries to use common terminology when maybe it should not be used. Example - weak damage can refer to damage dealt beyond the minimum damage range (smoky). But for Hammer it seems to imply damage beyond "most effective range"... or maybe not... It can be confusing.

I quoted you because you felt that other players post was not contributing. But you are incorrect. It was sarcasm - an expression on how the WAR is going. And my post was conveying it's in bad taste to show players with a lot of stars, when many other players can't get into site. But you don't understand that? Now I'm beginning to think it's a communication issue - as English does not seem to be your main language. And after all, this is an English forum... B)

How does this address the issue many players are experiencing? If a group of players has a head-start right off the bat the system is compromised. But let's divert from that issue and talk about me personally? :huh: You don't understand the phrase "slap in the face"? And you edit your posts after-the-fact without displaying the edit message?

Well, it's a nice slap in the face to everyone else who has issues logging into the WAR site.

1) could be 2) 3) 4) One can hope... B)

No numbers... #faliedagain