Happens every week -amirite?

With a 50% Crit making modules extremely weak why would Rail need a buff? Already has outlandish impact per hit...

What? You cant get 9999 without a 4th module. Can't buy the 4th module with crystals.

lots of 9999 players that end battles well under the limit. I dont pretend to be the best player around but I'm hardly the worst. These players have the OP-flavor of the month. Why the heck are they gonna waste time in the garage when their Paladin-Freeze with Trickster or Defender or Booster are sailing away with the win? Haven't equipped a Thunder module in 3 years. Haven't had the need to. So no idea why the noobs you are playing against are doing that.

that's not true. The players with OP combos don't need to change - they do fine with the set-up they came in with.

500 TK (for 3rd slot) is NOT cheap. That's almost the cost of a BP. And for the rest to get that 4th one via the event, they'd have to sit on 1000TK since they don't know when it's coming. All easier said than done.

? bruh

If you actually have it... ?

Would make a significant difference vs any turret that has bonus damage and also negates Supercharge. Much better than you "suggest". If I had it I'd equip 24/7 - would be the ONE module I'd never change.

Every turret has critical hits, including mines. How can you go wrong by equipping Armadillo?

I agree with a lot of what you say - except for the part about ODs being a good addition to the game. They are just too OP, and players rely on them too much. Besides - they are part of a positive feedback loop. The OD gets generated by time (fine) and scoring (not so fine). The team that is doing better will get ODs first and can use them to 1) suppress the enemy and 2) create faster battle score. The faster battle-score then allows that team to regenerate their OD even faster than the opposition. They keep getting better and better with OD more often. Game over. If the OD only generated with time, and both sides had an equal opportunity, the ODs might be ok. I say "might" because IMO they are still too potent. But ODs are not generated only by time, and thus imbalance the battles even further.

This is just silly. of course it's feasible - you protect yourself against the "attack" you are most worried about. If mines are not one of the top-3 you are worried about, then why complain? If you only have 3 slots and there's 4 turrets really bothering you - do you get to complain? It's a method of attack/defense, and should be treated just like another turret, which you can protect yourself against.

5% max chance. It exists but not really that much of a danger.

Of course there's plenty of issues with TO. I have tons of posts wrt that. But you are barking up the wrong tree with this subject.

LOL... you had... a whole THREE more kills.. Awesome. Just freakin' awesome! ?

You cry a lot. I mean a LOT. Give it a rest. No one sympathizes with your "plight". And since you had high score in the battle your example sucks. Everyone in battles encounters that, but they don't whine as much as you do. Or toot their own horn as much either. So I'm curious - what colour is the sky in your world?

"back in the day" that would have been a paint... maybe Emerald...

During a battle... ?

Or at least put on a stinking spider module before complaining... ?

You were 33/9 and first overall in the battle. Why are you still complaining? Upset you couldn't go 55/9 ? ?

It's basically Super-Mario-Kart... designed for 10-year olds. That's who they are catering to nowadays.

1) Main mine problem actually comes from saboteur. One press of button and multiple mines dropped. lot more of those in the game than miner. 2) why choose miner if your mines are not indefinite? Saboteur would STILL be better. 3) They already nerfed miner by making the mines disappear if you die 2x in 30 seconds. Certainly possible in todays TO. Especially when your team is losing. 4) Use Spider module. Poster is L7 and does not have a Spider module. That might make an impact ?

Ding! Ding! Ding! ?

Game cannot survive without a large contingent of F2P takers. Without the F2P takers the buyers will be fighting buyers. How long you think they will continue to spend $$ when they are not getting the advantage they have over F2P tankers? it IS economic suicide to encourage F2P tankers to leave. MM will collapse.

You don't have to have 10 combos to switch. Having a 50% module against... 0 enemies helps you how much? Switching to even a 25% module vs a couple enemies is infinitely better... no?