How is this any different from a month ago? or 1 year ago. What does damage indicator tell you NOW that it did not tell you before?

I agree it's needed. I use it by default now. But Defender does not need to be able to activate DD + DA simultaneously. After all, it's for Defending. Just completed stage 25 of the Challenge so now my Titan has Defender + AP. Overheating and EMP can still be problems, but at least I have no more worries about AP.

Chrome. Lots of Chrome.

Well then you must be extremely unlucky in your critical shots. To start you have a 50% chance. Also, have you looked at the WIKI recently? LCR now only does +20% damage. Used to be 40% bonus. On the other hand, Death Herald has such a minute nerf, I would think more players would use it...

It is somewhat OP and still needs a tweak. IMO, it should not have the lowered cooldown benefit. Currently, I can use DD and immediately use DA (Defender). This should be nerfed.

No. Too dark. Leave that for special events like Halloween.

So what if modules are a pain to fight against. It's not supposed to be easy. In TO there are plenty of ways to destroy tanks, even with 50% modules. Overdrives and Drones contribute immensely to this. AP and other augments were introduced not as a "balancing" measure. They were introduced to generate $$. Why do you think they are not available in the garage for crystals? You are being naive if you think otherwise. I see you like Rail on this account but you haven't even played on it for a week. What is your main?

Ummm... no. YOU WIN! ?

Can't beat the Top-3x15 two weeks in a row ... ?

Still going strong on this I see ... ?

What specific Rail were you one-shotting Vikings with before? Average damage WAS 1200. x2 = 2400. Vikings have 3000, so you would have had to be extremely lucky to get 1500+. Your chances were probably << 50%. Max damage now is 1600 for Critical, and you have a 50% for that. So your odds of 1-shotting a Viking have actually increased with the new system.

YUP.

So what. Then those players are wasting a slot. It hurts them, not the non-existent Rail players. No idea what you are trying to say here. And you've missed the point entirely. If a turret is prevalent, players will protect against it. If lots of protections - switch turret. When there's much less of a reason to use the Rail module, players will stop using it all the time. Your first statement is a one-off, as there are very few battles with no Rails involved. Nerfing an expensive module so the delicate Rail players can be happy is just stupid.

You mistake my reference. Now look up the cylons from 1978...

So many players have multiple turrets now, there no excuse to equip Rail because CS "popularized" it. None. Zero. The fact is, many players continue to use Rail despite having many other choices. If they choose to continue to use Rail, even though they may suffer because many enemies equip that module, it's on them. They refuse to adapt. So to placate these stubborn players the Devs have introduced the most ridiculous solution - allow Rail, which has the highest % chance for Critical shot, to bypass the module. Modules players have spent hundreds of thousands of crystals to buy and upgrade. That is just brutal and unforgivable.

The number of enemies out there now with AP is just ridiculous. Every battle there's at least 2 or 3, if not more. Only 7 more stages. LOL.

Fixed it for ya!

Higher quality of image? I suppose. From design or esthetics? NOPE. All that chrome/metal that masks the good paints we have? It looks like a childs toy from the bargain-bin of the toys that never got sold. Thank Goodness one of my accounts got lucky on a Challenge skin with Hunter Prime. And just in time.

I was hoping it did not look like something from Battlestar Galactica. And when I say BattleStar Galactica I mean the 1978 version.

? ? ? ? ?

?

Did not like a lot about TX - but one thing I DID like was the Tar paint/coating.

No.

Saying something is better than something else that is trash does not make it good. Both are trash?

Not even close - it is absolute rubbish. Looks like a 10-year-old that builds Revel models of 70s Cameros designed it. It is just way, way too busy. My apologies if you were involved in the design and I just insulted you. But seriously - it is hideous. Apologies again.