Wow, that's tempting! I think I'll actually pay $15 even though I have planned not to spend any more money on this game! Wait? What?! $200? hahaha

We do, they're now called augments. If they're all in fact augments now, then why weren't the old ones buffed? So you'd rather deal 100% rather than 115% damage at 50% HP? Before you answer this, I know you'd rather be immune to new AP augments, but this requires paying large amounts of $ for a dying game. People who spent money and time upgrading turrets and hulls now are weak on the battlefield. This company doesn't treat its customers seriously and luckily such are eliminated from the free market.

CTF doesn't mean camping isn't advantageous. I'm not sure if you ever played 1v1 m8 Skill is not an absolute value nor is it constantly the same (I'm not even talking about learning, just better/worse days) so you can't be certain. But yes, it is easier to know roughly when you have played a lot with someone.

IDK if the Striker AP alt only fires 1 AP missile or 3 regular ones with it. But the Freeze AP is OP. You get to deal 110% of your regular damage to opponents with DA while making them easy to kill for your allies. You also ignore their protection modules. Rest are also overpowered, some having no disadvantages (Rico) and Railgun being sort of an exception. And yes, they're useless against AP immunity, some pretty much unplayable. So you need to gamble on conts to get a P2W hull augment which is a hard counter to other P2W augments. Otherwise you're done for. Adrenaline in turn has no disadvantages at all. Alterations are meant to alter turret gameplay (pointless with so many turrets, but still), not make them directly superior.

Surely it is more effective than playing 8v8 MM (LOL), but it still rarely ends an argument due to the fact that there is lag, luck, the fact that most players aren't able to play their best every day at any time. Another problem is camping. It is possible to camp in so many ways that no one ever managed to establish universal anti-camping rules for any map. While the camping example I provided is blatant and looked down on by many good players, in many other situations it is way more vague and controversial.

Why 1v1 is hardly relevant: That being said XP/BP players tend to analyze their mistakes and make attempts to improve their tank control/aim, so they are likely to be better at MM if they are familiar with it.

Great idea, I think the sample is big enough to roughly understand the situation.

It is not. Many people like games for what they are and stick to their favorites. People who love trying out new things all the time and get bored quickly never make for a stable playerbase. They will be gone very quickly and more than likely won't ever come back even if you change your game completely — there are so many other games to try out after all.

Using DA-SB-DD is useful for drugging up fast so idk why you'd want to use this for heavies that take time to get into position. For all hulls it depends on the situation and the turret you're using, but if we're talking about spawning and pushing forward I'd rather use SB-DA-DD. If you're saving supplies, I understand. But if there still is a chance change the battle outcome, you should use supplies to win or at least draw.

In addition to this, we need a format in which you can't use Magnum. It is probably too late though because this game is dying so fast, especially PRO battles.

AP augments and Adrenaline have no/hardly any disadvantages, so what are you complaining about? All of them ought to be nerfed.

AP is meant to make players aware of the battle situation shine. Or so says the V-LOG haha Just like drones are to keep the game diverse. Diversity is not necessarily something good but drones don't even boost this. They're just another thing for buyers to buy and were not added to make the game better or more interesting. And the reason for shortening battles. I remember the two reasons for which this happened: shorter battles = more fun (so they said, who cares that players think differently) and it would be easier to grind stars (as though they couldn't increase the amount of stars per battle instead). All this propaganda is just to keep children and morons playing this game and make them think the game is not dying but going in a good direction. It doesn't need to make sense — the masses pick up slogans rather than listening to reason. So the devs may keep shouting 'Diversity!', 'Fun!', 'Tactics!', 'Rewards!'. Idc cos I do not enjoy MM anyway. And I don't feel like gambling on conts trying getting OP augments or skins in a dying game.

I only got common items with my first (and only) 13 UC. The fact that it actually happened to you as well doesn't mean UC aren't manipulated. Yes, they surely use RNG but may at the same time be rigged in other to work on the player's mind. The aim in getting UC is mostly getting OP augments/skins, so people might keep buying them in their frustration to finally get the most sought items. Some people say UC are worse than regular conts. In my experience it seems to be true.

Used in competitive non XP/BP drug battles to respawn quickly with full hp and drugs. Think Island.

There is enough time to write 'd3s'. Now seriously, I can't write anything more than 'ggwp' after the battle ends. I can't comment on the battle, challenge my opponents to a rematch or invite them to play another map. This ought to be fixed.

That's what the pros do :T

I myself sometimes complain about noob teammates when playing random Garder 2v2 matches but whenever I enter Parma I am frustrated with people complaining because I'm not familiar with this map. People learn from mistakes, but once they do they forget how much time it took them to achieve the level they're on. Such behaviour is in most cases caused by frustration, but still you must remember: you'd be an average player at most if players worse than you didn't exist, and you'd remain a noob if you didn't take your time learning. So be easy on them nubs

This is good but the HTML5 version still needs shots to leave holes on obstacles and players should be able to chat after a battle has ended.

16v16 will be so bad to play. No place to maneuver, just drive up to the nearest tank with a DPS weapon and shoot... No damage glitches? Lag? Fix them on PC before you even touch mobile.

Funny how ODs were added without any reason and now devs are trying to make people use them in tactical ways to justify their existence. But indeed I agree, Viking's disadvantage is its OD anyway.

This is kinda understandable as MM is not competitive. But people can use Android emulators or some gaming mobile devices and play without a disadvantage while using things that should be considered as hacks. Also, can't mobile players still access XP/BP?

Crystals and XP have been devaluated, as well as supplies, but what's wrong with that (especially the latter)? Non-buyers have much like no chance to max out anyway nor can they access OP equipment at all. I guess what you want is some extra things to achieve in game, such as achievements that you could flaunt or extra ranks. Otherwise this topic sounds rather ironic.

Whenever I see this in XP/BP I leave, having made a remark about its usage

In 2014 was looking for tank games on Miniclip, found TO and was super hyped. This was my first 3D multiplayer lol

These were not 13 in a row. When a user opens 15 containers, the game generates drops 15 times with the given odds, then shows them in order by rarity.