Topic merged Not really possible at the moment due to the fact that large maps take too long to load and will lag a lot.

Not for me. Check again to see if the issue was fixed.

Valid [intf] [imprv] [vsfx]

What do you mean? If it's a non-XP battle, then obviously any combination is allowed (as long as it's the highest grade you have).

Because all turrets get only x2 damage from DD, while Isida also basically gets x2 armor due to doubled rate of healing. So combined with DA, that's x4 armor and x2 damage. Very OP.

Nothing. The closed beta testing is now over and if you want to play Tanki X, you simply need to register a new account and download the game. If you want to, you can use your current name from Tanki Online if it hasn't been taken, or choose any other available name. Please ask any further questions in the Q&A topic and after you create your Tanki X account, use that account to log in and ask questions on the Tanki X forum. Closed.

Topic merged Railgun's damage will be reduced in an upcoming update, so that will remove its ability to one-shot unprotected hulls.

Topic merged

Too bad :D Time to practice and work up some actual skill in this game, rather than relying on the overpowered stats of the turret.

Topic merged The video you posted may be somewhat true, but it contains a lot of misleading points. First of all, decrease of Tanki Online's popularity based on the Google Trends graphs. Even though I can't disagree with the fact that the number of searches is clearly decreasing, I have to argue about whether it was solely because of only bad updates in the game. Here's the same graph, only this tome also compared to TO's main competitor - World of Tanks: As you can see, both games started drastically losing popularity after the same date (and with a very similar pattern) - December 2014. This was probably caused by another similar game being released on the market, resulting in many players being distracted and drawn away by it. Or maybe tank games are simply going out of fashion. Whatever the case it, it clearly isn't the standard "Tanki Online sucks now, I'm leaving to WoT!", because if that was the case, WoT's graph would not be going down in the same manner. The second thing I want to point out is the fact that the only reason Tanki Online isn't being advertised is because it's an outdated game, so Developers instead spend their marketing funds on Tanki X, because it's a new installment that has a lot of potential for future improvements. What's the point of attracting players to TO, when TX has much more modern graphics and will most likely have more features than TO in a few years?

Topic merged You realise that this "nerf" is meant to bring Isida on the same level as other turrets, right? Hence the "balance". By "compensating" for the nerf you are just making Isida more powerful again and destroying the whole purpose of reducing Isida's healing in the first place. In my opinion Isida will be fine after the update. This change would simply make it more annoying for players trying to fight against Isida.

Topic merged

Topic merged Same as disabling damage in parkour. This has been suggested many times before.

Look, I'm pretty sure even developers themselves want to add this game mode to Tanki Online permanently, but it's just not on their priority list right now and no amount of player requests will change that. I'm keeping this topic open so that you can still try to do what you wanted, but I'm telling you that this is almost certainly a pointless waste of time.

Topic merged

Assault mode was very popular during the holidays and developers are fully aware that players want to have it back in the game as a permanent game mode. Cedric doesn't have any power when it comes to deciding what gets added to the game, so there is no point trying to bring this to his attention. The game mode was removed for reworking (as it was very unbalanced and had certain other issues), but at the moment there are no plans to bring it back in the near future.

The problem is that you're a relatively new player, so (I assume) the whole concept of format battles and the different names for stuff isn't too familiar to you and therefore you can still easily accept changes. But all the "veteran" players who have been calling this format XP/BP for years now will be upset and we'll get another wave of "tanki is dying, I'm leaving forever!" comments if the current name is changed.

You can find some explanation about that here and here. In Russian some letters may look identical to the Latin (i.e. English) alphabet, but they mean a completely different letter. So "X" is for "Хорнет", which means "Hornet" and is pronounced exactly the same because it's not even a Russian word for "Hornet" - just a literal transcription of the English word using Russian letters. Same goes for the B in BP - it stands for "Васп", which means "Wasp" and is pronounced the same, even though the actual Russian word for "wasp" is "Oса" (osa, which is ironically the name of an existing tanki map). The P stands for "Рельса" (relsa), which means Railgun. So in fact, even though literally every English player pronounces "XP/BP" as "ekspee-beepee" (heck, even I do!), all Russians pronounce the format name as "HR/VR". By that logic the new format will be pronounced as DR in Russian and there is no reason for it to be called "AP".

Sounds like fun, although I really doubt that it will catch on. Just like BP format, DR is probably gonna be in great minority compared to XP and XP/BP, with maybe 1 or 2 DR battles for every 50 XP. Of course RU1 will be full of it on the day of the release, but that will be only the initial craze. Developers would need to do some serious promotions to popularise such an old format. Maybe something like giving everyone a free trial on the first day, even if players don't have a PRO pass, dictator and railgun. That letter is "Д", which is the Cyrillic "D". And indeed, Dictator in pronounced pretty much the same in Russian. Д is not an A, so don't confuse the two :D

As said above, the current prices in the game have been balanced carefully to allow the average player to save up enough crystals to upgrade one turret, one hull and a module comfortably. Reducing the prices will result in less players wanting to buy crystals with real money, therefore the project will lose revenue and will risk economic failure. We do not accept ideas for reducing items' prices or adding more discounts. Closed.

Moved from Game Discussion

ok done

Actually, if you want, I can remove the archive record and put this one in the main section. Because the only reason it was moved to archive is because there was no second screenshot to prove the battle duration.

Too specific. We already have separate ones, which were given to you.

Topic merged Won't happen. This adds ability to transfer crystals between accounts. For example you have a Major acc and a generalissimo acc. You earn thousands of crystals on Generalissimo (which is easier because you have better equipment and funds are higher), you buy as many gold box supplies as you can, go into a private battle with both of your accounts, drop all the gold boxes from the Generalissimo and collect them with Major. Result: OP alternate account with a ton of crystals. Don't suggest to add anything else like extra rules or limitations to prevent this kind of transfer - people will always find ways to abuse such a system.