So you're saying that buying more than one bundle doesn't necessarily increase the chances of winning?

Are you talking about the battle pass?

I was hoping to be one of the winners in the giveaway to make up for the utter disappointment of a fund this was. Sadly I didn't win.

Here's what I got from the 83 ultra containers that I received from the various ways of the compensation event: @TheCongoSpider, if you want, you can use these pics for whatever you have in mind.

The missions look so interesting. Think I'll participate in it with a chance to get 65 ultra containers.

I think unless something very interesting happens in the next few days, I probably wont play tanki until they fix their servers. You would think that most devices could easily run this game, but when you take into account that most of us can't remember the last time they performed server optimizations. You probably can't help but wonder if games like world of tanks and war thunder would run more smoothly despite them being more heavily on graphics, more players, etc. I'll still buy the funds and whatever bundles come up if I feel they're worth it.

If the price went from 835k to 1.26 million, then that means it is not "almost twice as expensive" like you've been saying. It'd be alot more accurate to say that they are around 50% more expensive.

Actually, it sounds alot more like gauss than it does striker. Except for the non instantaneous part.

Didn't know there was a competition to see whose playing hours in tanki will be the first to outlive the dinosaurs.

The only form of camping that I can think of that could be considered an act of unfair and dishonest practice would be spawn camping - which would be to spawnkill the enemies over and over and over again, alot of the times it involves going to a spot in the enemy base where they have a difficult time getting to and shooting from there. - Other than that, camping is just another valid strategy.

Should be useful for most users. Crisis users are an exception though because of its feature. OOF. How the heck did you understand his explanation but not mine? Why would you only activate repair kit when you could use double armor then repair kit?

That's precisely what I mean.

What do you mean? I don't recall seeing such a feature. Please elaborate.

If this means what I think it means, then no more spending up to 13 minutes in the loading screen, hopefully.

Actually, you wont be able to do multiple ques, just the first one you made. You can que in the supply again once it deactivates. The entire thing will refresh when you respawn. Also pressing the supply again when its already in que will cancel it.

Fixed it for ya. Also who cares if they re-use things? If it'll make the funds better, then that's all we should care about. ?

They must be the ones lagging then.

Doesn't even have to be new augments. Just select from the current existing ones. Shouldn't take more than 5 minutes to do so.

Sounds more like the effects of tanki's server instability.

I feel like having a desired order of which the supplies will activate in will be very beneficial for players in a pinch. For example, you choose the double damage supply first, then the double armor, then mine, then speed boost. Your double damage will activate first, then next is double armor, then you lay a mine, and finally you activate speed boost. To cancel a supply from the order you just tap or click it again.

No, I think I just barely came back at the time. What if instead, they make a thing called legendary augments container where you can get a random augment of the legendary category?

Instead of 5 pulsars or 11 mono paints or 6 skins where half of them were legacies I just want variety. For 5 augments, this should've happened instead: 1 pulsar, 1 random augment that inflicts one status effect, and the rest have interesting mechanics. For 11 paints, this should've happened instead: 4 mono paints, 4 epic category paints, 3 animated paints. For 6 skins, this should've happened instead: 1 GT combo, 1 legacy combo, 1 xt combo.

You could've of just proven your own claim, and then tell them to prove you wrong. Not just a few vague words. I'm not gonna deny that this does happen. I still think its a good idea to prove your claim regardless. The outcome though depends on how you prove it. You don't wanna be this example though: A debate about what color the day time sky really is on a sunny day. You say " blue". And then you say "because our eyes wants us to see it as blue". I never said that though?

Not only that but when you do manage to get into the event mode, you have to deal with constant lagspikes. Hopefully tomorrow will be better.

You know, its pretty hypocritical of you to tell others to prove you wrong when you haven't even proven your own claim to be true.