-
Posts
1 336 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
18
Everything posted by Jeers4U
-
lol. Again, sadly I agree.
-
lol. Sadly, i agree.
-
nothing but rails in that pic, lol...
-
...starting...?
-
What Is Your Opinion About the Current State of Tanki Online?
Jeers4U replied to Maf in Game Discussion
It doesn't matter what he said in the complaint thread (really). No one at tanki is going to listen. It interferes with the sound of counting money... -
Some can only discover it's utmost trashiness by participating.
-
Too much visual garbage in the field of view. But rail aim assist, tho.
-
they're testing bots in the forum now, i guess...
-
What did y'all do to the game overnight? It's literally EVEN trashier 24 hours later. Did I mention aim assist rail is complete garbage now? I didn't? Well... aim assist rail is complete garbage now.
-
Tanki deserves to be taken off the developers' (Opex-Rah) hands. They drove it to the ground.
Jeers4U replied to Committee in Game Discussion
I also support MAF But rail aim assist sucks. Who's idea WAS that? -
Tanki deserves to be taken off the developers' (Opex-Rah) hands. They drove it to the ground.
Jeers4U replied to Committee in Game Discussion
Tanki cares not for loyalty. Loyalty pays no bills nor buys no 'porche's. Money does. This game--today--is meant to be disposable. I mean, let's be honest. This game is trash. Disposable. Throw away. Not memorable. -
Tanki deserves to be taken off the developers' (Opex-Rah) hands. They drove it to the ground.
Jeers4U replied to Committee in Game Discussion
I did not engage in the chat/forum until after overdrives were implemented. If anyone complained, I was not a part of it. And I don't really retain anyone else's complaints. My official complaint has always been the failure of having even strength teams during matchmaking. Most other complaints are jabs at tanki's silliness. However, I am really enjoying reading all the different perspectives. Just saying. -
Tanki deserves to be taken off the developers' (Opex-Rah) hands. They drove it to the ground.
Jeers4U replied to Committee in Game Discussion
And for me, this wasn't my first game and I wasn't a kid. And there were flaws, sure. But the flaws back then were something you could live with because they weren't as ridiculous as the flaws the game has now. -
Don't worry, my dude. I'm sure that all the hackers infesting tanki only confine themselves to the parkour arenas. (lol)
-
Tanki deserves to be taken off the developers' (Opex-Rah) hands. They drove it to the ground.
Jeers4U replied to Committee in Game Discussion
Except... that it WAS fun back then. Source: Me. Back then. Remove the people employed by tanki from the voting results and I wonder what the poll would look like... -
I think we need to rename this game from tanki to Railski. In honor of the fabulous turret that never misses.
-
They should call it 'auto hit' and not 'aim assist'... It's a more accurate description. It's changed the game in a negative manner.
-
While I'm not calling you a liar. I don't believe you. At. All.
-
What I've observed (and I made a complaint in the complaint book about it) is that the rail turret doesn't even have to be aiming in your direction for it to score a hit anymore. So, I'm not sure this magical phenomenon can be even blamed on lag at this point. Just shoddy programming.
-
Doesn't happen with the majority of the other turrets, though. Primarily rail. Scorpion was always sketchy programming with the kooky flight path of its rockets, but it's almost always rail shots through buildings. So... aim assist needs to be altered.
-
I wonder if clicking on the 'report post' link will report my post or the orignal post I copied it from. Did you want to try it and see what happens?
-
Understood. For future reference, if this bug happens six months from now (because this bug has been around for a LONG time), and I report it, will that count as a 'repost' and is in violation, or will you consider that the bug is 'not fixed' and needs reporting?
-
What is this little 'report post' link on my post and why don't I see it on anyone else's posts in that specific spot?
-
I would prefer choosing my own reward. I would never ever ever choose something as lame as a paint as a reward (but i don't begrudge those who would). To me, nothing screams 'noob' like a brightly colored paint sticking out on the battlefield... But at the same time, I would prefer to choose something from a turret or a hull I actually use rather than from the 14 I don't use. Maybe you should factor that into your calculations. Just because you GET an augment doesn't mean you will USE the augment...
Jump to content


































































