The best defence against a Hornet is attack. If you react fast enough, you may be able to kill it before it deals much damage. Doesn't really work though if it's using Defender, or is camping on the other side of the map.

Since your topic isn't a particularly major or original idea, and it fits into a "category" topic, it is given the merge tag. This means that the topic stays separate for a few days to allow for discussion, but gets merged into the larger topic once it becomes inactive. For more information please see the guide for posting ideas.

I feel like you completely missed the point of this topic :Р This has nothing to do with COVID-19 - I posted this topic WAY before that was a thing. This is just discussing a hypothetical (and completely unrealistic) scenario where every single person above a certain age suddenly disappears in one moment. Let's say that age is 12. So imagine a world populated entirely by a few hundred million children (infants, babies, toddlers), the oldest of whom are 12 years old. They have very little idea about how society works. They don't know how to run the economy, how to maintain infrastructure, how to go through the necessary emergency procedures in order to secure their future. The grim reality is that the vast majority of babies and toddler would die of hunger within days, simply because readily available food has run out, and they lack the skills to obtain more. But slightly older children will be able to scavenge food in supermarkets, provide themselves with basic necessities, and survive at least for a few years, during which they can organise communities and acquire the knowledge needed to create a more sustainable form of survival. It would most likely be extremely basic - farming crops and maintaining shelter from available materials, but it will be enough. Then, after a number of years, they can slowly reacquire the lost knowledge by self-learning through libraries and trial-and-error methods, eventually slowly repopulating the earth and rebuilding civilisation. So the ultimate question I'm asking is - how young can the children be in order to be able to do all of the above?

You can either click and hold the topic title, or click "edit" on the topic, and in the editor change the title and save. In Ideas and Suggestions moderators usually change topics of valid ideas to better reflect the content, but since your idea will soon be merged anyway, changing the topic is pointless.

Please discuss this in the following topic: Closed.

I'm not sure how this relates to the topic. With around 80% of the population disappearing instantly, concepts like banks, retirement and savings will instantly become obsolete. Once the remaining population gets over the initial shock, trading will most likely be done via bartering, rather than using typical currency.

Actually, it just came up in conversation in one sort of podcast-letsplay youtube video. Their discussion was very brief, but I liked the topic.

Means that the new topic was either a duplicate of an existing idea/discussion, or it fits into one of the category topics. When the topic gets "merged", it becomes part of the larger topic, turning into a normal reply.

If you believe your ban was unfair, please send a forum PM to one of the chat administrators: @Hate or @Defender. Likewise, if you have any complaint about any helper's behaviour, you should contact their respective admin. We do not allow public discussion or criticism of moderators' actions. Closed.

Well, they both used OD on each other and flipped. And, well... Tanki physics happened and the juggernaut got stuck on the wall. Kinda reminds me of this scene from Thor: Ragnarok

I'm with @DaringDeer on this one. The automated system is quite well done, so let's continue this project over in his thread: Closed.

That's boring. Why not make them boost damage instead?

That alteration is the most underrated one at the moment. From what I understand, it basically gives Wasp the ability to drive through a field of mines at full speed while under fire from railguns, smokys and ricochets, with zero risk of being flipped or affected in any way (besides losing health). Combine that with upgraded Defender and a good set of modules, and you get a flag stealer with near 100% effectiveness, capable of being stopped only by some overdrives.

The main point of overdrives was to make hulls drastically different from one another, so adding an option to switch them around would contradict their purpose. Won't happen.

So people are genuinely trying to help you, and you just respond with sarcastic and condescending comments to their suggestions? We don't appreciate such behaviour on the forum, so I suggest you change your attitude. Looks like you haven't logged into the game for a while, so keep in mind: You get one free mission change per day, and after that you need to either pay, or continue changing for free via TO mobile version (by watching ads). On your screenshot the "change mission" button doesn't show a price, therefore it's free. You can change this mission. Most people completed their remaining DM missions before DMs were removed from the game. You are probably the only one with such an "issue", so it's not worth making such a big deal out of it. In the end you could just change it for 999 crystals - it won't make you bankrupt. Closed.

Yeah, exactly. With the supplies available at hand, children would be able to survive on their own just by scavenging. Once they get older, they'll be able to establish more sustainable sources of food, water and supplies. Eventually might be able to rebuild civilisation.

Since this is just a nerf suggestion, we give it some time for discussion and then merge it into here: The idea will still be included in the weekly report.

Portuguese. Because apparently I'm literally gonna immigrate to Portugal within a year or so. Lawful Good vs Chaotic Evil. Question: Should I give mjmj a week or month ban for that ping? ?

They don't need to have a survey for that lol. All the data about in-game accounts is available to them internally.

Because helpers already get significant compensation for their work in the form of crystals, so by participating in contests with limited prizes, we would be taking away players' opportunity to get some extra crystals for themselves. A lot of players, especially in the Russian community, expressed their dismay in this regard, so the rule was put in place. Perhaps your logic adds up, but for the moment that's the rule.

Where is the option for "I'm not allowed to participate in contests"? ?

I condensed the poll into fewer options. I think it makes sense to vote based on your highest ranked account.

I just think that devs don't need players to tell them that they could add more bundles. Things like bundles, kits, shop priced and special offers depend on a bunch of factors that they analyse internally.

Or were they? ?

All the main points have already been stated above. If you'd like to discuss this further, I suggest the "Let's Discuss Matchmaking" topic. As for suggestions to improve the game - those go into the I&S section. Closed.